And Best Supporting Cardboard goes to…

Natalie Portman? Seriously?

1 Paula // Dec 7, 2005 at 4:49 am

Yeah. Natalie’s acting wasn’t entirely stellar in this movie. (I’ve liked her in others. Not in Ep3, though.) But Ian McDiarmid?! He MUST be nominated. What a riveting performance.

But I really loved the Padme ads. They’re beautiful!
2 Dunc // Dec 7, 2005 at 1:39 pm

I think those are ads for the Costume Design nom, which I could totally get behind. Portman is a fantastic clothes hanger.
3 Amy // Dec 7, 2005 at 4:04 pm

Hayden Christenson and Best Actor do not belong within 700 words of each other. Unless there is a Not involved.
4 ImperialGirl // Dec 7, 2005 at 8:04 pm

I am totally behind Ian McDiarmed getting a Best Supporting Actor nomination. (Hey, IIRC they nominated Alec Guiness for Best Supporting Actor in 1977–it would be a nice full-circle kind of moment at the least.) I doubt he’d win, but it would be nice if he were nominated.

I just hope that the film at least cleans up in technical awards and doesn’t get bumped out by something like Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (which I find I STILL haven’t bothered to go see.) Frankly ROTS really impressed me there–for once, I didn’t mind the CGI. Everything flowed. Everything works.

Club Jade